Most knowledge
is abstract. Every thought begins in the mind as an abstract idea or notion. Abstract
thinking is one of the unique characteristics of human beings created in God’s
image and it is critical for the creation of concrete things. Yet, when abstract thinking remains within the
realm of the abstract world it loses its power.
For example: When a child is
taught that 2+2=4 he may understand the concept. He may even be able to add
many numbers to one another in the abstract and even be able to perfectly understand
the principle behind addition and subtraction. However, it is only when he understands
through experience how addition and subtraction is applied to real life does he
have true knowledge.
The child quickly learns that if he has 2 dollars and
another 2 dollars is added to
his original money, much more buying power is
available. Conversely, he also learns that if he has 2 dollars and 2 dollars is
taken from him, or he spends it, he loses his buying power. Only when the
abstract knowledge of addition and subtraction is brought concretely into the
child’s present reality does addition and subtraction become real. It is at
that time that addition and subtraction have concrete ramifications to the life
of the individual.
When the
abstract can be experienced by the senses, in the real world, it becomes
concrete. Only that which is concrete is actually measurable. Concreteness also
becomes experiential while nothing in the abstract can. You cannot experience
abstractness. You may be able to understand it, but you cannot experience it.
Case in point:
“Iowan elementary school teacher Jane
Elliot once tried to explain the injustice of bigotry, racism and prejudice to
her third grade students without much success. These were merely abstractions that
these students did not understand. Even if they did understand bigotry and
hatred it still remained in the abstract. In order to transform the abstract
into a concrete reality she decided to conduct an experiment.
Chip and Dan
Heath explain in their book, “Made To Stick.” 1
She came to the class…with a plan:
She aimed to make prejudice tangible to her
students. At the start of class she
divided the students into two groups: brown-eyed kids and blue-eyed kids. She
then made a shocking announcement: Brown-eyed kids were superior to blue-eyed
kids. “They’re the better people in the room.” The groups were separated: Blue-eyed
kids were forced to sit at the back of the classroom. Brown-eyed kids were told
that they were smarter. They were even given extra time at recess. The blue-eyed
kids had to wear special collars so that everyone would know their eye color from
a distance. The two groups were not allowed to mix at recess. Elliot was
shocked at how quickly the students turned into nasty, vicious, discriminating
third graders. “It was ghastly” she said. “
Elliot then
changed the rules. The next day she announced that it was actually the brown-eyed
children who were inferior and not the blue-eyed children.
“This reversal of fortune was
embraced instantly….as [the blue-eyed students] ran to place their collars on their
lesser brown-eyed counterparts. On the day when they were in the inferior group,
students described themselves as sad, bad, stupid, and mean….Even their performance
on academic tasks changed….Elliot’s simulation made prejudice concrete –
brutally concrete.”
P112
Within the
realm of Christian Reconstruction, concreteness is the only thing that really brings
about change by making it real and measurable. One can contemplate deconstructing
the public school system, for example, but without a concrete alternative to
the concrete problem nothing can be achieved.
Authors
Chip and Dan Heath also give this example:
“A V-8 engine is concrete. ‘A high performance’
vehicle is abstract.”
Concreteness
can be defined as real people doing real things which are experienced in real
life, and which are measurable in time and history. Simply put, concreteness is
when specific people do specific things. When it comes to cultural renovation
concreteness is the only valid answer to fulfilling the dominion mandate. Everything
else is just abstract talk; head-scratching and pontificating.
Concreteness is what gives abstractness its power. It is the foundation of abstract thought. In fact, the abstract demands the concrete in order to bring it to life in the real world. Without the aid of the concrete the abstract is destined to die on the vine of empty theoretics.
The Heath brothers
put it this way.
“Trying to teach an abstract
principle without concrete foundations is like trying to start a house by
building a roof in the air.”
Achievable Targets
Concreteness
makes solutions attainable. It cuts through the confusion by
making the targeted
end more visible and by putting the target in both an understandable and reachable
framework. Once an abstract objective or strategy is put into a concrete tactical
framework the brain is mobilized. Concreteness focuses the brain on exactly
what needs to be done in order to bring to pass what was only conceptualized in
the abstract. If the dominion mandate of Christian Reconstruction is to ever transition
from the pure abstractness of discussion into the maturity of concreteness we
need to begin thinking in terms of actually doing something. To think only abstractly
is to accomplish nothing. To think concretely is to accomplish anything.
If you wish
to discuss some concrete projects which you can begin in your community you can
private message me via Face Book or via my email at pastor@hisglory.us.
1 Made To Stick by Chip and Dan Heath, Random House, New York, 2008
No comments:
Post a Comment